Quarterly statutory compliance check on a maintenance contract
We take off your hands: checking planned maintenance against the SFG20 schedule, proving subcontracted visits happened and quoting the defects they found.
You get: a clear compliance position for the client, with drift from the SFG20 schedule flagged for your service manager and subcontractor defects priced.
Get a price for thisOr check first: Are we ready for AI?
The problem
When a client audits us we can't prove every statutory visit happened.
How the steps join up
It starts when: a quarter ends on a planned maintenance contract, or the client asks for an audit.
Find where your planned maintenance has drifted from the SFG20 schedule
Your team checks and decides at this step.
Check subcontracted maintenance visits happened and the paperwork came back
Your team checks and decides at this step.
Turn defects found on service visits into priced remedial quotes
Your team checks and decides at this step.
Chase unanswered remedial quotes and track which ones are won
Produce each client's monthly service report
Your team checks and decides at this step.
What you end up with: Drift from the contracted SFG20 schedule is found and explained, subcontracted specialist visits are proven, their defects are quoted and the client sees a clear compliance position.
Who signs it off: Your service manager signs off justified variations, and competent persons act on any statutory gaps.
What it needs to work
- A contracted SFG20 schedule held in the job software
- Subcontractor reports received
If those aren’t in place yet, you’ll hear that before anything gets built.
Who it’s for
- Specialist subcontractors
What would this cost for your team?
Answer questions about your company and how this work runs today. You see an indicative estimate of the hours back, what that time is worth and the price when you send your details.
Get a price for thisOr check first: Are we ready for AI?