Nobody names or files routine documents by hand.
Drawings, revisions, RAMS packs, certificates, subcontractor paperwork and O&M items land in the right place under the right name as they arrive.
Your best people spend hours naming, filing and chasing paperwork instead of running jobs. Once the AI is set up, every document is recognised as it lands, named, filed, checked for what’s missing and sent to whoever has to act. Your document management software is rarely the problem. The handling around it is.
Not sure yet? Prove the return first with a Feasibility Study
Every document that lands on a live job goes through the same few steps. Those steps stop being your team’s problem.
Drawings, revisions, RAMS packs, certificates, subcontractor paperwork and O&M items land in the right place under the right name as they arrive.
Dates, values, revision numbers, expiry dates, scope changes and who’s named on it get pulled out, so you search for them instead of opening folders.
It reaches whoever has to act, with the gap already named, instead of sitting in a shared inbox until someone chases it.
The automation follows the way paperwork really moves in your business, email attachments and local copies included, not the version on a process map.
It’s worth it when a document turns up all the time and costs you when it’s late, wrong or missing.
Certificates, insurances, RAMS and accreditation records arrive constantly, expire on a date and hold up work when they can’t be produced.
A one-off contract a director reads once isn’t worth automating, however easy it would be to set up.
Hours a week spent naming, filing and chasing documents, times what those hours cost, times the weeks in a year. Add the last job held up by a missing certificate. That’s what a fix has to beat. If paperwork rarely holds up a job, spend your money elsewhere.
It is the automated handling of documents as they move through a project: identifying what a document is, naming and filing it, extracting the key points, flagging what is missing and routing it to the person who has to act.
The repeatable ones. Drawings and revisions, RAMS packs, insurance and accreditation certificates, subcontractor paperwork, O&M items, site records and client correspondence all follow patterns a system can learn.
Usually not. It sits around the drive or project platform you already use, and does the repeat work of getting documents into it properly and out to the right person.
The system prepares and passes things on. People sign off anything with contractual, commercial or safety weight. Who can see what, version control and a record of every change are set up before the build, not after.
No. It works from what already arrives: emails, photos and attachments named anything. Your site teams carry on as they are. The sorting happens after it lands.